Rich People Trades
  • Business
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Business
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing

Rich People Trades

Politics

Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

by admin September 9, 2025
September 9, 2025
Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

President Donald Trump is still facing a $83.3 million payment to writer E. Jean Carroll after a federal appeals court rejected his challenge of a defamation verdict against him Monday.

The ruling from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds a lower court decision finding that Trump did, in fact, defame Carroll. Trump’s lawyers argued his comments about Carroll were protected by presidential immunity and that the verdict in the case was unjust. The three-judge panel rejected both of those claims.

‘We conclude that Trump has failed to identify any grounds that would warrant reconsidering our prior holding on presidential immunity. We also conclude that the district court did not err in any of the challenged rulings and that the jury’s damages awards are fair and reasonable,’ the court opinion read.

‘The record in this case supports the district court’s determination that the ‘the degree of reprehensibility’ of Mr. Trump’s conduct was remarkably high, perhaps unprecedented,’ the court added.

Carroll sued Trump twice after she released a book in 2019, which claimed Trump raped her during a brief encounter with him in a department store dressing room in the 1990s.

Trump vigorously denied the claims, saying he had never met Carroll, that she was not his ‘type’ and that she fabricated the incident to sell books. His vocal and repeated criticisms and denials led to Carroll’s defamation allegations.

Monday’s ruling comes months after the same court rejected Trump’s appeal in another Carroll-related case. In that appeal, Trump challenged evidence that Carroll’s legal team introduced to the jury during the civil lawsuit, including the Access Hollywood tape that surfaced during Trump’s 2016 campaign.

The full panel of judges declined to hear Trump’s argument, however, forcing the president to either accept defeat or appeal to the Supreme Court.

Read the full ruling below (App users click here)

Fox News’ Ashley Oliver contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Thune lays groundwork for nuclear option in Senate fight over Trump nominees
next post
LAPD ends Kamala Harris security after union backlash over elite officer use: report

Related Posts

Trump HHS changes transgender Biden official’s nameplate back...

December 9, 2025

Senate Republican moves to give US an edge...

July 10, 2025

SpaceX launch scrubbed hours after Hegseth shares message...

March 13, 2025

‘Blindsided’: How Stefanik’s Trump nomination as UN ambassador...

April 1, 2025

Circuit court puts final nail in the coffin...

February 19, 2025

Musk says he hopes for ‘zero tariffs,’ freedom...

April 7, 2025

Fetterman calls out Dems’ flip: ‘We ran on...

October 22, 2025

House GOP elections chair reveals which voter blocs...

February 2, 2025

MIKE DAVIS: Trump’s latest pick to reform the...

September 21, 2025

Trump administration torpedoes SCOTUS with emergency requests and...

July 4, 2025

    Join our mailing list to get access to special deals, promotions, and insider information. Your exclusive benefits await! Enjoy personalized recommendations, first dibs on sales, and members-only content that makes you feel like a true VIP. Sign up now and start saving!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Editors’ Picks

    • 1

      First lady Melania Trump’s new official portrait revealed

      January 28, 2025
    • 2

      American fighters are dying in Ukraine in growing numbers. Bringing their bodies home is a complex task

      January 30, 2025
    • 3

      ECOWAS pledges to ‘keep door open’ after 3 coup-hit West African nations exit regional bloc

      January 30, 2025
    • 4

      Vale Launches Strategic Review of Thompson Nickel Operations Amid Market Challenges

      January 28, 2025
    • 5

      Europe’s busiest airport is set to get bigger, as Britain green-lights tortured Heathrow expansion project

      January 30, 2025
    • 6

      DeepSeek is giving the world a window into Chinese censorship and information control

      January 30, 2025
    • 7

      Top Altcoins to Watch in 2025: An Investor’s Guide

      January 28, 2025
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: richpeopletrades.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2026 richpeopletrades.com | All Rights Reserved