Rich People Trades
  • Business
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Business
  • World News
  • Politics
  • Investing

Rich People Trades

Politics

Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

by admin September 9, 2025
September 9, 2025
Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

President Donald Trump is still facing a $83.3 million payment to writer E. Jean Carroll after a federal appeals court rejected his challenge of a defamation verdict against him Monday.

The ruling from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds a lower court decision finding that Trump did, in fact, defame Carroll. Trump’s lawyers argued his comments about Carroll were protected by presidential immunity and that the verdict in the case was unjust. The three-judge panel rejected both of those claims.

‘We conclude that Trump has failed to identify any grounds that would warrant reconsidering our prior holding on presidential immunity. We also conclude that the district court did not err in any of the challenged rulings and that the jury’s damages awards are fair and reasonable,’ the court opinion read.

‘The record in this case supports the district court’s determination that the ‘the degree of reprehensibility’ of Mr. Trump’s conduct was remarkably high, perhaps unprecedented,’ the court added.

Carroll sued Trump twice after she released a book in 2019, which claimed Trump raped her during a brief encounter with him in a department store dressing room in the 1990s.

Trump vigorously denied the claims, saying he had never met Carroll, that she was not his ‘type’ and that she fabricated the incident to sell books. His vocal and repeated criticisms and denials led to Carroll’s defamation allegations.

Monday’s ruling comes months after the same court rejected Trump’s appeal in another Carroll-related case. In that appeal, Trump challenged evidence that Carroll’s legal team introduced to the jury during the civil lawsuit, including the Access Hollywood tape that surfaced during Trump’s 2016 campaign.

The full panel of judges declined to hear Trump’s argument, however, forcing the president to either accept defeat or appeal to the Supreme Court.

Read the full ruling below (App users click here)

Fox News’ Ashley Oliver contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Thune lays groundwork for nuclear option in Senate fight over Trump nominees
next post
LAPD ends Kamala Harris security after union backlash over elite officer use: report

Related Posts

Trump quietly signs sweeping $901B defense bill after...

December 19, 2025

‘Promises kept’: Trump signs executive order to ‘aggressively’...

February 19, 2025

Trump-backed bill to avert government shutdown passes House...

March 12, 2025

PHOTOS: The making of Trump’s White House ballroom,...

October 27, 2025

US used sonic weapon on Venezuelan troops, report...

January 12, 2026

FDA phasing out some animal testing in ‘win-win’...

April 11, 2025

Could the US be targeted as Iran retaliates...

June 14, 2025

Trump 100% disagrees with federal judge’s ‘crazy’ ruling...

February 10, 2025

‘UN80 Initiative’ appears to show world body’s panic...

March 13, 2025

Bernie Sanders, AOC, take aim at Trump and...

March 21, 2025

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Editors’ Picks

    • 1

      First lady Melania Trump’s new official portrait revealed

      January 28, 2025
    • 2

      American fighters are dying in Ukraine in growing numbers. Bringing their bodies home is a complex task

      January 30, 2025
    • 3

      ECOWAS pledges to ‘keep door open’ after 3 coup-hit West African nations exit regional bloc

      January 30, 2025
    • 4

      Vale Launches Strategic Review of Thompson Nickel Operations Amid Market Challenges

      January 28, 2025
    • 5

      Environmental Approval for Boland Infield Studies & Update on Scaled Column ISR Test

      September 19, 2025
    • 6

      Europe’s busiest airport is set to get bigger, as Britain green-lights tortured Heathrow expansion project

      January 30, 2025
    • 7

      DeepSeek is giving the world a window into Chinese censorship and information control

      January 30, 2025
    • Terms and conditions
    • Privacy Policy

    Disclaimer: richpeopletrades.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2026 richpeopletrades.com | All Rights Reserved